The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science logo


  • Help
Login Register

  1. Home
  2. To appear
  3. Cost-Effective Biomarker Studies for Cox ...

The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science

Submit your article Information Become a Peer-reviewer
  • Article info
  • Full article
  • More
    Article info Full article

Cost-Effective Biomarker Studies for Cox Regression with Serial Biospecimens: Bias Mitigation and Improved Efficiency
Jianchu Chen   Richard J. Cook  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.51387/26-NEJSDS110
Pub. online: 25 August 2026      Type: Methodology Article      Open accessOpen Access
Area: Statistical Methodology

Accepted
25 July 2026
Published
25 August 2026

Abstract

Disease registries often involve cohorts of patients seen repeatedly at tertiary care centers with biospecimens collected at periodic clinic visits. With such registries it is possible to study the association between time-dependent biomarkers and a failure time of interest through Cox regression. However it can be prohibitively expensive or labor-intensive to assay all biospecimens for all members of the registry and in practice it is common to select a single biosample to assay for each individual. We derive the asymptotic bias of estimators obtained from the Cox model based on common strategies. We investigate the nature of this bias from a joint multistate model for the marker and failure processes. Alternative selection methods are then developed for consistent and efficient sub-sampling under budgetary constraints. The asymptotic relative efficiency of regression coefficients obtained from the Fisher information is then explored and an optimal design is identified within a class of designs. The proposed selection method is illustrated in a registry of patients with psoriatic arthritis where we investigate the association between a time-dependent biomarker (ESR_CRP) and the risk of developing arthritis mutilans.

References

[1] 
Andersen, P. K. and Gill, R. D. (1982). Cox’s Regression Model for Counting Processes: A Large Sample Study. The Annals of Statistics 10(4) 1100–1120. MR0673646
[2] 
Andersen, P. K. and Liestøl, K. (2003). Attenuation caused by infrequently updated covariates in survival analysis. Biostatistics 4(4) 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/4.4.633.
[3] 
Binquet, C., Chêne, G., Jacqmin-Gadda, H., Journot, V., Savès, M., Lacoste, D., Dabis, F. and the Groupe d’Epidémiologie Clinique du SIDA en Aquitaine (2001). Modeling Changes in CD4-positive T-Lymphocyte Counts after the Start of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy and the Relation with Risk of Opportunistic Infections The Aquitaine Cohort, 1996–1997. American Journal of Epidemiology 153(4) 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/153.4.386.
[4] 
Cook, R. J. and Lawless, J. F. (2007) The Statistical Analysis of Recurrent Events. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-69810-6. MR3822124
[5] 
Cook, R. J. and Lawless, J. F. (2018) Multistate Models for the Analysis of Life History Data. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315119731.
[6] 
Cook, R. J. and Lawless, J. F. (2021). Independence conditions and the analysis of life history studies with intermittent observation. Biostatistics 22(3) 455–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxz047. MR4287163
[7] 
Cook, R. J., Lawless, J. F. and Xie, B. (2022). Marker-dependent observation and carry-forward of internal covariates in Cox regression. Lifetime Data Analysis 28(4) 560–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-022-09561-9. MR4484929
[8] 
Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression Models and Life-Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 34(2) 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x. MR0341758
[9] 
de Bruijne, M. H. J., le Cessie, S., Kluin-Nelemans, H. C. and van Houwelingen, H. C. (2001). On the use of Cox regression in the presence of an irregularly observed time-dependent covariate. Statistics in Medicine 20(24) 3817–3829. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1083.
[10] 
Gladman, D. D. and Chandran, V. (2011). Observational cohort studies: lessons learnt from the University of Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Program. Rheumatology 50(1) 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq262.
[11] 
Gladman, D. D., Shuckett, R., Russell, M. L., Thorne, J. C. and Schachter, R. K. (1987). Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) - An Analysis of 220 Patients. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 62(2) 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.qjmed.a068085.
[12] 
Jiang, S., Cook, R. J. and Zeng, L. (2020). Mitigating bias from intermittent measurement of time-dependent covariates in failure time analysis. Statistics in Medicine 39(13) 1833–1845. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8517. MR4098524
[13] 
Lawless, J. F. (2003) Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118033005. MR1940115
[14] 
Lin, D. Y. and Wei, L. J. (1989). The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84(408) 1074–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478874. MR1134495
[15] 
Papageorgiou, G., Mauff, K., Tomer, A. and Rizopoulos, D. (2019). An Overview of Joint Modeling of Time-to-Event and Longitudinal Outcomes. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 6(1) 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-030718-105048. MR3939519
[16] 
Raboud, J., Reid, N., Coates, R. A. and Farewell, V. T. (1993). Estimating Risks of Progressing to Aids when Covariates are Measured with Error. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 156(3) 393–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/2983065.
[17] 
Struthers, C. A. and Kalbfleisch, J. D. (1986). Misspecified proportional hazard models. Biometrika 73(2) 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/73.2.363. MR0855896
[18] 
Tsiatis, A. A., Degruttola, V. and Wulfsohn, M. S. (1995). Modeling the Relationship of Survival to Longitudinal Data Measured with Error. Applications to Survival and CD4 Counts in Patients with AIDS. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90(429) 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476485
[19] 
Tsiatis, A. A. and Davidian, M. (2004). Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data: an OVERVIEW. Statistica Sinica 14(3) 809–834. MR2087974
[20] 
Wulfsohn, M. S. and Tsiatis, A. A. (1997). A Joint Model for Survival and Longitudinal Data Measured with Error. Biometrics 53(1) 330–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533118. MR1450186
[21] 
Xu, J. and Zeger, S. L. (2002). Joint Analysis of Longitudinal Data Comprising Repeated Measures and Times to Events. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics 50(3) 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00241. MR1856332

Full article PDF XML
Full article PDF XML

Copyright
© 2026 New England Statistical Society
by logo by logo
Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords
Misspecified Cox models Time-dependent covariates Intermittent observation Multistate models Cost-effective sampling Survival analysis

Funding
This work was funded by grants to Richard J. Cook from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (FRN 13887) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2017-04207).

Metrics
since December 2021
1

Article info
views

0

Full article
views

0

PDF
downloads

0

XML
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science

  • ISSN: 2693-7166
  • Copyright © 2021 New England Statistical Society

About

  • About journal

For contributors

  • Submit
  • OA Policy
  • Become a Peer-reviewer
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy