Precision Dose-Finding Design for Phase I Oncology Trials by Integrating Pharmacology Data
Pub. online: 3 September 2026
Type: Methodology Article
Open Access
Area: Cancer Research
Accepted
15 June 2026
15 June 2026
Published
3 September 2026
3 September 2026
Abstract
Phase I oncology trials aim to identify a safe dose—often the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)—for subsequent studies. Conventional designs focus on population-level toxicity modeling, with recent attention on leveraging pharmacokinetic (PK) data to improve dose selection. We propose the Precision Dose-Finding (PDF) design, a novel Bayesian phase I framework that integrates individual patient PK profiles into the dose-finding process. By incorporating patient-specific PK parameters (such as volume of distribution ${V_{i}}$ and elimination rate ${k_{i}}$), PDF models toxicity risk at the individual level, in contrast to traditional methods that ignore inter-patient variability. The trial is structured in two stages: an initial training stage to update model parameters using cohort-based dose escalation, and a subsequent test stage in which doses for new patients are chosen based on each patient’s own PK-predicted toxicity probability. This two-stage approach enables truly personalized dose assignment while maintaining rigorous safety oversight. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate the feasibility of PDF and suggest that it provides improved safety and dosing precision relative to the continual reassessment method (CRM). The PDF design thus offers a refined dose-finding strategy that tailors the MTD to individual patients, aligning phase I trials with the ideals of precision medicine.
References
Babb, J. S. and Rogatko, A. (2001). Patient specific dosing in a cancer phase I clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine 20(14) 2079–2090. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.848. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sim.848.
Cheung, Y. K. (2005). Coherence principles in dose-finding studies. Biometrika 92(4) 863–873. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/92.4.863. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/92.4.863. MR2234191
Goodman, S. N., Zahurak, M. L. and Piantadosi, S. (1995). Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. Statistics in Medicine 14(11) 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780141102.
Guo, W., Wang, S. -J., Yang, S., Lynn, H. and Ji, Y. (2017). A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressing Ockham’s razor: mTPI-2. Contemporary Clinical Trials 58 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.006.
Iasonos, A. and O’Quigley, J. (2014). Adaptive dose-finding studies: a review of model-guided phase I clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology 32(23) 2505–2511. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.6051.
Ji, Y., Li, Y. and Bekele, B. N. (2007). Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals. Clinical Trials 4(3) 235–244. PMID: 17715248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774507079442.
Ji, Y., Liu, P., Li, Y. and Bekele, B. N. (2010). A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials. Clinical Trials 7(6) 653–663. PMID: 20935021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774510382799.
Liu, M., Wang, S. -J. and Ji, Y. (2020). The i3+3 design for phase I clinical trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 30(2) 294–304. PMID: 31304864. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2019.1636811.
Liu, S. and Yuan, Y. (2015). Bayesian optimal interval designs for phase I clinical trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics 64(3) 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12089. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12089. MR3325461
Ma, P., Ma, H., Liu, R., Wen, H., Li, H., Huang, Y., Li, Y., Xiong, L., Xie, L. and Wang, Q. (2024). Prediction of vancomycin plasma concentration in elderly patients based on multi-algorithm mining combined with population pharmacokinetics. Scientific Reports 14 27165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78558-1.
Mould, D. and Upton, R. (2013). Basic Concepts in Population Modeling, Simulation, and Model-Based Drug Development—Part 2: Introduction to Pharmacokinetic Modeling Methods. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology 2(4) 38. https://doi.org/10.1038/psp.2013.14.
Nikanjam, M., Kato, S., Sicklick, J. K. and Kurzrock, R. (2023). At the right dose: personalised (N-of-1) dosing for precision oncology. European Journal of Cancer 194 113359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113359.
Ollier, A. and Mozgunov, P. (2025). On Inclusion of Covariates in Model Based Dose Finding Clinical Trial Designs. Statistics in Medicine 44(3–4) 10337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10337. MR4860485
O’Quigley, J., Pepe, M. and Fisher, L. (1990). Continual Reassessment Method: A Practical Design for Phase 1 Clinical Trials in Cancer. Biometrics 46(1) 33–48. Accessed 2025-04-10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531628. MR1059105
Piantadosi, S. and Liu, G. (1996). IMPROVED DESIGNS FOR DOSE ESCALATION STUDIES USING PHARMACOKINETIC MEASUREMENTS. Statistics in Medicine 15(15) 1605–1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960815)15:15<1605::AID-SIM325>3.0.CO;2-2.
Robertson, T., Wright, F. T. and Dykstra, R. (1988) Order Restricted Statistical Inference. Probability and Statistics Series. Wiley. https://books.google.com/books?id=sqZfQgAACAAJ. MR0961262
Silva, R. B., Cheng, B., Carvajal, R. D. and Lee, S. M. (2024). Dose Individualization for Phase I Cancer Trials With Broadened Eligibility. Statistics in Medicine 43(29) 5534–5547. Epub 2024 Oct 31. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10264. MR4835378
Storer, B. E. (1989). Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. Biometrics 45(3) 925–937. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531693. MR1029610
Su, X., Li, Y., Müller, P., Hsu, C. -W., Pan, H. and Do, K. -A. (2022). A semi-mechanistic dose-finding design in oncology using pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modeling. Pharmaceutical Statistics 21(6) 1149–1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2249.
Tosi, D., Laghzali, Y., Vinches, M., Alexandre, M., Homicsko, K., Fasolo, A., Del Conte, G., Durigova, A., Hayaoui, N., Gourgou, S., Gianni, L. and Mollevi, C. (2015). Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First-in-Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies. Journal of Clinical Oncology 33(19) 2158–2165. PMID: 26014300. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.58.1082.
Toumazi, A., Comets, E., Alberti, C., Friede, T., Lentz, F., Stallard, N., Zohar, S. and Ursino, M. (2018). dfpk: An R-package for Bayesian dose-finding designs using pharmacokinetics (PK) for phase I clinical trials. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 157 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.023.
Ursino, M., Zohar, S., Lentz, F., Alberti, C., Friede, T., Stallard, N. and Comets, E. (2017). Dose-finding methods for phase I clinical trials using pharmacokinetics in small populations. Biometrical Journal 59(4) 804–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201600084. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201600084. MR3672699
Whitehead, J., Zhou, Y., Hampson, L., Ledent, E. and Pereira, A. (2007). A Bayesian approach for dose-escalation in a phase I clinical trial incorporating pharmacodynamic endpoints. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 17(6) 1117–1129. PMID: 18027220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400701645165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400701645165. MR2414565
Yang, C. and Li, Y. (2024). An extended Bayesian semi-mechanistic dose-finding design for phase I oncology trials using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information. Statistics in Medicine 43(4) 689–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9980. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9980. MR4690125
Yuan, S., Huang, Z., Liu, J. and Ji, Y. (2024). Pharmacometrics-Enabled DOse OPtimization (PEDOOP) for seamless phase I-II trials in oncology. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 0(0) 1–20. PMID: 38888933. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2364716.