The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science logo


  • Help
Login Register

  1. Home
  2. To appear
  3. Precision Dose-Finding Design for Phase ...

The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science

Submit your article Information Become a Peer-reviewer
  • Article info
  • Full article
  • Related articles
  • More
    Article info Full article Related articles

Precision Dose-Finding Design for Phase I Oncology Trials by Integrating Pharmacology Data
Kyong Ju Lee   Yuan Ji  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.51387/26-NEJSDS107
Pub. online: 3 September 2026      Type: Methodology Article      Open accessOpen Access
Area: Cancer Research

Accepted
15 June 2026
Published
3 September 2026

Abstract

Phase I oncology trials aim to identify a safe dose—often the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)—for subsequent studies. Conventional designs focus on population-level toxicity modeling, with recent attention on leveraging pharmacokinetic (PK) data to improve dose selection. We propose the Precision Dose-Finding (PDF) design, a novel Bayesian phase I framework that integrates individual patient PK profiles into the dose-finding process. By incorporating patient-specific PK parameters (such as volume of distribution ${V_{i}}$ and elimination rate ${k_{i}}$), PDF models toxicity risk at the individual level, in contrast to traditional methods that ignore inter-patient variability. The trial is structured in two stages: an initial training stage to update model parameters using cohort-based dose escalation, and a subsequent test stage in which doses for new patients are chosen based on each patient’s own PK-predicted toxicity probability. This two-stage approach enables truly personalized dose assignment while maintaining rigorous safety oversight. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate the feasibility of PDF and suggest that it provides improved safety and dosing precision relative to the continual reassessment method (CRM). The PDF design thus offers a refined dose-finding strategy that tailors the MTD to individual patients, aligning phase I trials with the ideals of precision medicine.

References

[1] 
Babb, J. S. and Rogatko, A. (2001). Patient specific dosing in a cancer phase I clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine 20(14) 2079–2090. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.848. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sim.848.
[2] 
Cheung, Y. K. (2005). Coherence principles in dose-finding studies. Biometrika 92(4) 863–873. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/92.4.863. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/92.4.863. MR2234191
[3] 
Goodman, S. N., Zahurak, M. L. and Piantadosi, S. (1995). Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. Statistics in Medicine 14(11) 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780141102.
[4] 
Guo, W., Wang, S. -J., Yang, S., Lynn, H. and Ji, Y. (2017). A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressing Ockham’s razor: mTPI-2. Contemporary Clinical Trials 58 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.006.
[5] 
Iasonos, A. and O’Quigley, J. (2014). Adaptive dose-finding studies: a review of model-guided phase I clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology 32(23) 2505–2511. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.6051.
[6] 
Ji, Y., Li, Y. and Bekele, B. N. (2007). Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals. Clinical Trials 4(3) 235–244. PMID: 17715248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774507079442.
[7] 
Ji, Y., Liu, P., Li, Y. and Bekele, B. N. (2010). A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials. Clinical Trials 7(6) 653–663. PMID: 20935021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774510382799.
[8] 
Liu, M., Wang, S. -J. and Ji, Y. (2020). The i3+3 design for phase I clinical trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 30(2) 294–304. PMID: 31304864. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2019.1636811.
[9] 
Liu, S. and Yuan, Y. (2015). Bayesian optimal interval designs for phase I clinical trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics 64(3) 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12089. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12089. MR3325461
[10] 
Ma, P., Ma, H., Liu, R., Wen, H., Li, H., Huang, Y., Li, Y., Xiong, L., Xie, L. and Wang, Q. (2024). Prediction of vancomycin plasma concentration in elderly patients based on multi-algorithm mining combined with population pharmacokinetics. Scientific Reports 14 27165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78558-1.
[11] 
Mould, D. and Upton, R. (2013). Basic Concepts in Population Modeling, Simulation, and Model-Based Drug Development—Part 2: Introduction to Pharmacokinetic Modeling Methods. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology 2(4) 38. https://doi.org/10.1038/psp.2013.14.
[12] 
Nikanjam, M., Kato, S., Sicklick, J. K. and Kurzrock, R. (2023). At the right dose: personalised (N-of-1) dosing for precision oncology. European Journal of Cancer 194 113359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113359.
[13] 
Ollier, A. and Mozgunov, P. (2025). On Inclusion of Covariates in Model Based Dose Finding Clinical Trial Designs. Statistics in Medicine 44(3–4) 10337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10337. MR4860485
[14] 
O’Quigley, J., Pepe, M. and Fisher, L. (1990). Continual Reassessment Method: A Practical Design for Phase 1 Clinical Trials in Cancer. Biometrics 46(1) 33–48. Accessed 2025-04-10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531628. MR1059105
[15] 
Piantadosi, S. and Liu, G. (1996). IMPROVED DESIGNS FOR DOSE ESCALATION STUDIES USING PHARMACOKINETIC MEASUREMENTS. Statistics in Medicine 15(15) 1605–1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960815)15:15<1605::AID-SIM325>3.0.CO;2-2.
[16] 
Robertson, T., Wright, F. T. and Dykstra, R. (1988) Order Restricted Statistical Inference. Probability and Statistics Series. Wiley. https://books.google.com/books?id=sqZfQgAACAAJ. MR0961262
[17] 
Shargel, L., Andrew, B. and Wu-Pong, S. (1999) Applied biopharmaceutics & pharmacokinetics 264. Appleton & Lange Stamford, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
[18] 
Silva, R. B., Cheng, B., Carvajal, R. D. and Lee, S. M. (2024). Dose Individualization for Phase I Cancer Trials With Broadened Eligibility. Statistics in Medicine 43(29) 5534–5547. Epub 2024 Oct 31. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10264. MR4835378
[19] 
Storer, B. E. (1989). Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. Biometrics 45(3) 925–937. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531693. MR1029610
[20] 
Su, X., Li, Y., Müller, P., Hsu, C. -W., Pan, H. and Do, K. -A. (2022). A semi-mechanistic dose-finding design in oncology using pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modeling. Pharmaceutical Statistics 21(6) 1149–1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2249.
[21] 
Tosi, D., Laghzali, Y., Vinches, M., Alexandre, M., Homicsko, K., Fasolo, A., Del Conte, G., Durigova, A., Hayaoui, N., Gourgou, S., Gianni, L. and Mollevi, C. (2015). Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First-in-Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies. Journal of Clinical Oncology 33(19) 2158–2165. PMID: 26014300. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.58.1082.
[22] 
Toumazi, A., Comets, E., Alberti, C., Friede, T., Lentz, F., Stallard, N., Zohar, S. and Ursino, M. (2018). dfpk: An R-package for Bayesian dose-finding designs using pharmacokinetics (PK) for phase I clinical trials. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 157 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.023.
[23] 
Ursino, M., Zohar, S., Lentz, F., Alberti, C., Friede, T., Stallard, N. and Comets, E. (2017). Dose-finding methods for phase I clinical trials using pharmacokinetics in small populations. Biometrical Journal 59(4) 804–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201600084. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201600084. MR3672699
[24] 
Whitehead, J., Zhou, Y., Hampson, L., Ledent, E. and Pereira, A. (2007). A Bayesian approach for dose-escalation in a phase I clinical trial incorporating pharmacodynamic endpoints. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 17(6) 1117–1129. PMID: 18027220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400701645165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400701645165. MR2414565
[25] 
Yang, C. and Li, Y. (2024). An extended Bayesian semi-mechanistic dose-finding design for phase I oncology trials using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information. Statistics in Medicine 43(4) 689–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9980. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9980. MR4690125
[26] 
Yuan, S., Huang, Z., Liu, J. and Ji, Y. (2024). Pharmacometrics-Enabled DOse OPtimization (PEDOOP) for seamless phase I-II trials in oncology. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 0(0) 1–20. PMID: 38888933. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2364716.

Full article Related articles PDF XML
Full article Related articles PDF XML

Copyright
© 2026 New England Statistical Society
by logo by logo
Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords
Bayesian design Dose response Pharmacodynamics Pharmacokinetics Toxicity

Metrics
since December 2021
45

Article info
views

15

Full article
views

23

PDF
downloads

11

XML
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science

  • ISSN: 2693-7166
  • Copyright © 2021 New England Statistical Society

About

  • About journal

For contributors

  • Submit
  • OA Policy
  • Become a Peer-reviewer
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy