The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science logo


  • Help
Login Register

  1. Home
  2. Issues
  3. Volume 1, Issue 1 (2023)
  4. Dynamic Continuous Flows on Networks

The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science

Submit your article Information Become a Peer-reviewer
  • Article info
  • Full article
  • More
    Article info Full article

Dynamic Continuous Flows on Networks
Volume 1, Issue 1 (2023), pp. 62–68
Justina Zou   Yi Guo   David Banks  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.51387/22-NEJSDS3
Pub. online: 25 April 2022      Type: Methodology Article      Open accessOpen Access
Area: Engineering Science

Accepted
7 March 2022
Published
25 April 2022

Abstract

There are many cases in which one has continuous flows over networks, and there is interest in predicting and monitoring such flows. This paper provides Bayesian models for two types of networks—those in which flow can be bidirectional, and those in which flow is unidirectional. The former is illustrated by an application to electrical transmission over the power grid, and the latter is examined with data on volumetric water flow in a river system. Both applications yield good predictive accuracy over short time horizons. Predictive accuracy is important in these applications—it improves the efficiency of the energy market and enables flood warnings and water management.

References

[1] 
Andreadis, K. M. and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2006). Assimilating remotely sensed snow observations into a macroscale hydrology model. Advances in Water Resources 29(6) 872–886. ISSN 0309-1708. URL. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309170805002058.
[2] 
Bassamzadeh, N. and Ghanem, R. (2017). Multiscale stochastic prediction of electricity demand in smart grids using bayesian networks. Applied energy 193. 369–380.
[3] 
Chen, X., Irie, K., Banks, D., Haslinger, R., Thomas, J. and West, M. (2018). Scalable bayesian modeling, monitoring, and analysis of dynamic network flow data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 113(522) 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1345742.
[4] 
Clarke, R. T. et al.(1988). Stochastic processes for water scientists: development and applications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[5] 
Iman Ghalehkhondabi, Ardjmand, E., Weckman, G. R. and Young, W. A. (2017). An overview of energy demand forecasting methods published in 2005–2015. Energy Systems 8(2) 411–447.
[6] 
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K. and Martinez, G. F. (2009). Decomposition of the mean squared error and nse performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of hydrology 377(1–2) 80–91.
[7] 
Vijai Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S. and Yapo, P. O. (1999). Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of hydrologic engineering 4(2) 135–143.
[8] 
Haberlandt, U. and Radtke, I. (2014). Hydrological model calibration for derived flood frequency analysis using stochastic rainfall and probability distributions of peak flows. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18(1) 353–365.
[9] 
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer.
[10] 
Hor, C. -L., Watson, S. J. and Majithia, S. (2005). Analyzing the impact of weather variables on monthly electricity demand. IEEE transactions on power systems 20(4) 2078–2085.
[11] 
Hyndman, R. J. and Fan, S. (2009). Density forecasting for long-term peak electricity demand. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 25(2) 1142–1153.
[12] 
Mendoza, P. A., Clark, M. P., Barlage, M., Rajagopalan, B., Samaniego, L., Abramowitz, G. and Gupta, H. (2015). Are we unnecessarily constraining the agility of complex process-based models? Water Resources Research 51(1) 716–728.
[13] 
Mauro, N. (2017). Fundamentals of statistical hydrology. Springer.
[14] 
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of hydrology 10(3) 282–290.
[15] 
Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., Clark, M. P., Wood, A. W., Nijssen, B. and Nearing, G. (2017). Benchmarking of a physically based hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrometeorology 18(8) 2215–2225.
[16] 
Singh, V. P. (2018). Hydrologic modeling: progress and future directions. Geoscience letters 5(1) 1–18.
[17] 
Son, H. and Kim, C. (2017). Short-term forecasting of electricity demand for the residential sector using weather and social variables. Resources, conservation and recycling 123. 200–207.
[18] 
Taylor, J. W. and Buizza, R. (2003). Using weather ensemble predictions in electricity demand forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting 19(1) 57–70.
[19] 
Wang, S., Sun, X. and Lall, U. (2017). A hierarchical bayesian regression model for predicting summer residential electricity demand across the usa. Energy 140. 601–611.
[20] 
Wilke, U. (2013). Probabilistic bottom-up modelling of occupancy and activities to predict electricity demand in residential buildings. Technical report, EPFL.

Full article PDF XML
Full article PDF XML

Copyright
© 2023 New England Statistical Society
by logo by logo
Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords
Autoregressive models Bayesian hierarchical models Network flows

Metrics
since December 2021
608

Article info
views

285

Full article
views

290

PDF
downloads

139

XML
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science

  • ISSN: 2693-7166
  • Copyright © 2021 New England Statistical Society

About

  • About journal

For contributors

  • Submit
  • OA Policy
  • Become a Peer-reviewer
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy