The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science logo


  • Help
Login Register

  1. Home
  2. Issues
  3. Volume 1, Issue 3 (2023)
  4. Algorithm-Based Optimal and Efficient Ex ...

The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science

Submit your article Information Become a Peer-reviewer
  • Article info
  • Full article
  • More
    Article info Full article

Algorithm-Based Optimal and Efficient Exact Experimental Designs for Crossover and Interference Models
Volume 1, Issue 3 (2023), pp. 361–370
Shuai Hao   Min Yang   Wei Zheng  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.51387/23-NEJSDS41
Pub. online: 26 June 2023      Type: Methodology Article      Open accessOpen Access
Area: Statistical Methodology

Accepted
9 June 2023
Published
26 June 2023

Abstract

The crossover models and interference models are frequently used in clinical trials, agriculture studies, social studies, etc. While some theoretical optimality results are available, it is still challenging to apply these results in practice. The available theoretical results, due to the complexity of exact optimal designs, typically require some specific combinations of the number of treatments (t), periods (p), and subjects (n). A more flexible method is to build integer programming based on theories in approximate design theory, which can handle general cases of $(t,p,n)$. Nonetheless, those results are generally derived for specific models or design problems and new efforts are needed for new problems. These obstacles make the application of the theoretical results rather difficult. Here we propose a new algorithm, a revision of the optimal weight exchange algorithm by [1]. It provides efficient crossover designs quickly under various situations, for different optimality criteria, different parameters of interest, different configurations of $(t,p,n)$, as well as arbitrary dropout scenarios. To facilitate the usage of our algorithm, the corresponding R package and an R Shiny app as a more user-friendly interface has been developed.

References

[1] 
Yang, M., Biedermann, S. and Tang, E. (2013). On optimal designs for nonlinear models: a general and efficient algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association 108(504) 1411–1420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2013.806268. MR3174717
[2] 
Yang, M. and Stufken, J. (2008). Optimal and efficient crossover designs for comparing test treatments to a control treatment under various models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138(1) 278–285. arXiv:0505641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2007.05.005. MR2369633
[3] 
Low, B. Y. J. L., Lewis, S. M. and Prescott, P. (1999). Assessing robustness of crossover designs to subjects dropping out. Statistics and Computing 9(3) 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008974031782
[4] 
Matthews, J. N. S. (1988). Recent developments in crossover designs. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 56(2) 117. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403636. MR0963525
[5] 
Godolphin, J. D. (2004). Simple pilot procedures for the avoidance of disconnected experimental designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics 53(1) 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0035-9254.2003.05054.x. MR2043764
[6] 
Majumdar, D., Dean, A. M. and Lewis, S. M. (2008). Uniformly balanced repeated measurements designs in the presence of subject dropout. Statistica Sinica 18 235–253. arXiv:0710.0685. MR2384987
[7] 
Bose, M. and Bagchi, S. (2008). Optimal crossover designs under premature stopping. Utilitas Mathematica 75 273–285. MR2392763
[8] 
Zhao, S. and Majumdar, D. (2012). On uniformly balanced crossover designs efficient under subject dropout. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice 6(1) 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2012.647579. MR3196538
[9] 
Zheng, W. (2013). Universally optimal crossover designs under subject dropout. The Annals of Statistics 41(1) 63–90. arXiv:1303.2800v1. https://doi.org/10.1214/12-AOS1074
[10] 
Kushner, H. B. (1997). Optimal repeated measurements designs: the linear optimality equations. The Annals of Statistics 25(6) 2328–2344. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1030741075. MR1604457
[11] 
Kunert, J. and Martin, R. J. (2000). On the determination of optimal designs for an interference model. The Annals of Statistics 28(6) 1728–1742. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1015957478. MR1835039
[12] 
Kunert, J. and Mersmann, S. (2011). Optimal designs for an interference model. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 141(4) 1623–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2010.11.020. MR2747931
[13] 
Zheng, W. (2015). Universally optimal designs for two interference models. Ann. Statist. 43(2) 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-AOS1287
[14] 
Fedorov, V. (1972) Theory of Optimal Experiments Designs. New York: Academic Press. MR0403103
[15] 
Wynn, H. P. (1970). The sequential generation of D-optimum experimental designs. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41(5) 1655–1664. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177696809
[16] 
Silvey, S. D., Titterington, D. H. and Torsney, B. (1978). An algorithm for optimal designs on a design space. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 7(14) 1379–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610927808827719
[17] 
Torsney, B. Algorithms for a constrained optimization problem with applications in statistics and optimum design (1981). PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.
[18] 
Hettich, R. (1983). A review of numerical methods for semi-infinite optimization. In Semi-Infinite Programming and Applications (A. V. Fiacco and K. O. Kortanek, eds.) 158–178. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[19] 
Böhning, D. (1986). A vertex-exchange-method in D-optimal design theory. Metrika 33(1) 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01894766. MR0868043
[20] 
Harman, R. and Pronzato, L. (2007). Improvements on removing nonoptimal support points in D-optimum design algorithms. Statistics and Probability Letters 77(1) 90–94. arXiv:0706.4394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2006.05.014. MR2339022
[21] 
Torsney, B. and Martín-Martín, R. (2009). Multiplicative algorithms for computing optimum designs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139(12) 3947–3961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2009.05.007. MR2558341
[22] 
Martín-Martín, R., Rodríguez-Aragón, L. J. and Torsney, B. (2012). Multiplicative algorithm for computing D-optimum designs for pVT measurements. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 111(1) 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.10.014. MR2558341
[23] 
Yu, Y. (2010). Monotonic convergence of a general algorithm for computing optimal designs. The Annals of Statistics 38(3) 1593–1606. arXiv:0905.2646. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOS761
[24] 
Kiefer, J. (1974). General equivalence theory for optimum designs (approximate theory). The Annals of Statistics 2(5) 849–879. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176342810. MR0356386
[25] 
Zheng, W. (2013). Optimal crossover designs for the proportional model. The Annals of Statistics 41(4) 2218–2235. https://doi.org/10.1214/13-AOS1148. MR3127864
[26] 
Gurobi Optimization, LLC (2022). Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual. https://www.gurobi.com.
[27] 
R Core Team (2022). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
[28] 
Wang, X. and Chinchilli, V. M. (2021). Analysis of crossover designs with nonignorable dropout. Statistics in Medicine 40(1) 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8762. MR4194572
[29] 
Kempton, R. A., Ferris, S. J. and David, O. (2001). Optimal change-over designs when carry-over effects are proportional to direct effects of treatments. Biometrika 88(2) 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.2.391. MR1844839

Full article PDF XML
Full article PDF XML

Copyright
© 2023 New England Statistical Society
by logo by logo
Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords
Crossover Dropout Proportional Interference

Funding
Min Yang was supported by NSF Grant DMS-22-10546.

Metrics
since December 2021
392

Article info
views

170

Full article
views

170

PDF
downloads

65

XML
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science

  • ISSN: 2693-7166
  • Copyright © 2021 New England Statistical Society

About

  • About journal

For contributors

  • Submit
  • OA Policy
  • Become a Peer-reviewer
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy